Warner & Kaine urge Supreme Court to Allow Mail-in Voting
U.S. Sens. Mark R. Warner and Tim Kaine (both D-VA) joined a bipartisan, bicameral group of lawmakers and former lawmakers in filing an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of State of California, et al. v. United States Postal Service, et al. The lawsuit, brought by a coalition of state attorneys general, including Virginia’s Attorney General Jay Jones, challenges the legality of President Trump’s executive order and U.S. Postal Service rule seeking to exert control over mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Specifically, the case challenges a final rule issued by the USPS pursuant to Trump’s directive that imposes unconstitutional and unworkable restrictions on mail-in voting, including requiring states to provide a “citizenship verification list” and attempting to give USPS control over who can vote by mail.
Nearly one-third of Americans have voted by mail in recent elections — a voting practice Trump himself used as recently as August 2026, when he voted in Florida’s Republican primary.
In the court filing, the amici curiae argue that Trump’s Executive Order 14399 and USPS’s final rule violate the separation of powers and usurp congressional authorities outlined in Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which gives the States and Congress exclusive authority over election administration.
“As current and former legislators, amici took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States — including its guarantee of the separation of powers,” wrote the lawmakers. “Amici have a particular interest in defending the institutional role of the Legislative Branch under Article I of the Constitution and in vindicating the long-settled principle that the Constitution commits ultimate regulatory authority over federal elections to Congress. The Constitution does not contemplate the Executive Branch acting unilaterally to assert power over federal elections. Yet that is what the Order and Final Rule do.”
The amici also pointed to a recent federal court ruling blocking the USPS from implementing its newly finalized mail ballot rule for the midterm elections, saying the agency lacked the authority to implement the rule and that its actions are “substantively unconstitutional and contrary to law.”
“The district court correctly concluded that Appellees are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims that USPS lacked authority to issue the Final Rule, that the Final Rule unconstitutionally imposes mail-ballot requirements on the States, and that the Final Rule unconstitutionally bars non-compliant State and local election officials from using the USPS to mail ballots at all,” wrote the lawmakers.
The lawmakers concluded by asserting States’ power to administer elections and Congress’s power to make or alter rules regulating elections, which the Supreme Court itself has described as an “override” authority. Trump’s illegal incursion on this authority is an attempt to disenfranchise people who depend on mail-in ballots to vote.
“The integrity of our constitutional system depends on each branch keeping to its assigned role,” concluded the lawmakers. “The Framers set up a two-part system that gave the States default authority to regulate federal elections subject to Congress’s authority to override the States. The Framers did not provide the President with any authority to interfere in that system, nor has Congress subsequently imbued the President or the Executive Branch with any such authority by statute.”
In addition to Sens. Warner and Kaine, the amicus brief was filed by 259 lawmakers and former lawmakers, including the entire Senate Democratic Caucus.
Sens. Warner and Kaine have been pushing back on the Trump administration’s attempts to “take over” and “nationalize” our upcoming elections. Fighting to ensure the safety and security of our midterms and protect Americans’ constitutional right to vote, the senators have repeatedly demanded that USPS abandon its proposed rule to implement President Trump’s unconstitutional executive order to restrict voting by mail.
The full brief is available here.








September 12, 2026 @ 3:37 pm
RED
September 12, 2026 @ 11:08 am
2 stooges
September 12, 2026 @ 3:51 am
Look at these two morons, and we keep voting them in what the heck is wrong with us. People got to get out and vote and stop letting Northern Virginia run the state
September 12, 2026 @ 3:01 am
So they can cheat
September 12, 2026 @ 2:29 am
Vote red
September 12, 2026 @ 2:02 am
Should not be, 2 ballots were mailed to me, both identical
September 12, 2026 @ 12:57 am
So you can cheat
September 11, 2026 @ 8:30 pm
Awsome way to cheat oh but they already know that.
September 11, 2026 @ 8:02 pm
No Mail Ins…Democrats cheat!!!
September 11, 2026 @ 7:11 pm
2 old potty mouth 💩 💩
September 11, 2026 @ 6:43 pm
Pos pigs
September 11, 2026 @ 2:42 pm
Only people who should be able to mail it in are deployed service members and elderly and disabled
September 11, 2026 @ 5:10 pm
Anthony Altizer The president voted by Mail In vote. Mail-in vote is available to everyone. Period.
If you want to have criteria for it, hold your president and representatives accountable.
September 12, 2026 @ 10:42 am
Lori Davis not your president is OUR president! I didnt like the things biden did but for worse he was OUR president.
Just act like a grown up not a slogan. …..sorry ……old lady talking sense..
September 12, 2026 @ 3:54 pm
Mary Nester regardless of what the language I used, the statement remains the same. Instead of reacting to my statement, you reacted to one word: your.
If you want to say only certain people should access Mail-In voting, you should hold the president and all representatives who use it accountable. React to that statement, not a single word you disagree with.
Logic and reasoning might have failed you here Mary. How do you feel about the statement of holding this administration accountable when Mail-in voting is being scrutinized since many do use it and they don’t also fall into your own criteria?